Friday, April 28, 2006
|
|---|
TICKET PRICE | NUMBER OF FANS | GATE | SEAT LOCATION |
$10 | 5000 | $50,000 | 3rd Deck |
$14 | 5000 | $70,000 | Plaza OF |
$14 | 4000 | $56,000 | Plaza OF |
$20 | 1000 | $20,000 | Plaza Level |
$76,000 | |||
$14 | 3571 | $50,000 | Plaza OF |
Hmm...blasting the ownershp for doing a cost-benifit analysis of most efficient setup of the ballpark in terms of profit sounds like smart business to me. Greedy? Possibly, but jeez, thats what you are supposed to do. Their job isnt to have the most fans come to the game, its to make money and win ballgames (and probably in that order). You can argue that by making cheaper tickets more available, you have more fans= more potential for future sales, but they probably looked at that too.
But i will agree...the colisuem sucks. Huckabay made the reference that the A's don't want a new stadium just because it makse more money, but because they are tired of the managers toilet overflowing when it rains and crap like that. Yes, money is #1, but it isnt the end-all. (hmm...kendall is the end-all to rallys...I like it...)
And on a side note, when are we going to trade Payton?The cubs need a right handed platoon partner for Jones, maybe a prospect from them?
The only team I can see that would be dumb enuf to trade for Kendall is Washington (Schneider is batting .179) and I guess if we traded JP the A's could use Church, but the options in house are good enuf.
I've read that Brown has improved his D since he was drafted. Im sure he is no Pudge, but "handling a staff" has for the most part been shown as inconsequential, especialy when your catcher gets on base 35% of the time. I think its time to give him a shot.
Actually, what I should say is "Greedy? Absolutely".
Another thing I wanted to point out, realated to this stadium banter, is that all the studies Ive seen show thhat the effects of replacing a ballpark prove to be a bad idea. Now how about when you move the park 40 or so miles? it changes who works there, the surrounding area, etc. It seems parks like these (Pac Bell stimulating the Mission Bay Development, for example) provide more benifits than knocking down a park and building a new one in the parking lot. Especially when the old stadium remains viable (like the 49ers playing in the Stick). Or am I out of my area of knowledge here?
Believe it or not, I have eaten better food at the coliseum (even this year) than in the Giants food court/ballpark. Of course, you have to know what's good and what sucks.
I'll tell you this much...those Coliseum bathrooms make me damn glad to be a guy and not have to have any body part even possibly come into contact with anything in there. Sorry, ladies...you gals keep on squatting while the world remains my urinal.
PROFIT.
Sure they are the owners. How about making more profit by serving up a better product in a better environment and paying for your own damn stadium, then?
Just clean the bathrooms! Have employees shower! How about hosing down the seats once a week? Pick up some garbage...
I am so sick of this "low-budget" crap because the A's are in a small-market. So is San Francisco. It's 15 miles from Oakland across the Bay Bridge.
Who is kidding who?
The problem is that the A's don't give a damn because they know A's fans don't know any better to speak up.
What I really want to know is what kind of BlackBerry phone etc. I should upgrade to. I'm fixin' to be even more mobile than I already am. I figure this is a good group to ask.
Back to the Main Page
|
| KEVIN GOLDSTEIN |
|---|